[three] For example, in England, the High Court and the Court of Appeals are Each individual bound by their have previous decisions, however, For the reason that Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, Even though in practice it hardly ever does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent would be the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled that it as well as the other courts of England and Wales experienced misapplied the regulation for almost 30 years.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It really is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but isn't binding precedent.
This is because transfer orders are typically thought of within the administrative discretion of your employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
The proposal seems to be reasonable and acceded to. During the meantime police shall remain neutral in the private dispute between the parties, however, if any on the individuals is indulged in criminal action the police shall take prompt action against them under law. five. The moment petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more
PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
In the event you find an error within the material of a published opinion (like a misspelled name or even a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly-settled that though looking at the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to evaluate the benefit of all of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates who will be found to become most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed because of the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part of your respondent department.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of the police will be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, ensure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair on the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other Courts, Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated previously mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to both party and the case shall be decided because of the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have heard the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a nicely-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is issue into the get more info procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.